By Karin Aijmer, Christoph Rühlemann
Corpus linguistics is a fashioned technique which makes use of real language information, saved in huge machine corpora, because the foundation for linguistic examine. relocating clear of the normal intuitive method of linguistics, which used made-up examples, corpus linguistics has made an important contribution to all components of the sector. until eventually very lately, corpus linguistics has concentrated nearly completely on syntax and the lexicon; although corpus-based techniques to the opposite subfields of linguistics are actually quickly rising, and this can be the 1st instruction manual on corpus pragmatics as a box. Bringing jointly a staff of major students from world wide, this instruction manual seems at how using corpus information has expert learn into diverse key elements of pragmatics, together with pragmatic rules, pragmatic markers, review, reference, speech acts, and conversational business enterprise.
Read Online or Download Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook PDF
Best semantics books
Quantity 34 of "Syntax and Semantics" is a radical and obtainable evaluation and advent to Lexical practical Grammar (LFG), a idea of the content material and illustration of alternative features of linguistic constitution and the family members that carry among them. The e-book motivates and describes the 2 syntactic constructions of LFG: floor phrasal association is represented through a context-free word constitution tree, and extra summary practical syntactic kin like topic and item are represented individually, at practical constitution.
Context and the Attitudes collects 13 seminal essays by way of Mark Richard on semantics and propositional attitudes. those essays boost a nuanced account of the semantics and pragmatics of our speak about such attitudes, an account on which in asserting what anyone thinks, we provide our phrases as a 'translation' or illustration of ways the objective of our speak represents the area.
This e-book brings jointly novel paintings at the semantics and pragmatics of definite indefinite expressions that still show modality. those epistemic indefinites are determiners or pronouns that sign lack of information at the a part of the speaker, reminiscent of German irgendein and Spanish algun: the sentence Maria se caso con algun medico ('Maria married a few health care provider or other') either makes an existential assertion that there's a health care professional that Maria married and signs the speaker's lack of ability or unwillingness to spot the surgeon in query.
- Pragmatics and Law: Practical and Theoretical Perspectives (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology)
- Speaking of Events
- Interpreting Motion: Grounded Representations for Spatial Language (Explorations in Language and Space)
- Evaluative Semantics: Cognition, Language and Ideology (Frontiers of Cognitive Science)
Additional info for Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook
The difﬁculties in identifying indirect speech acts in naturally occurring discourse have also led researchers to use a combination of computerized 14 Christoph Rühlemann and Karin Aijmer searches and manual line-by-line analysis. In Paula Garcia McAllister’s case study, ‘the identiﬁcation-in-context’ methodology is used to explore Searle’s category of directives. The aim of her study is to investigate if there is a relationship between situation types and speech acts used in academic conversations.
Oxford: Blackwell. , Shen, Y. , Aiden, A. , Gray, M. , The Google Books Team, Pickett, J. , Nowak, M. A. and Aiden, E. L. 2011. Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331 (6014): 176–182. Morris, C. 1938. Foundations of the theory of signs. In O. Neurath, R. Carnap and C. Morris (eds), International Encyclopedia of Uniﬁed Science, pp. 77–138. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Ochs, E. 1996. Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In J. J. Gumperz and S.
As shown, for example, in Garcia’s contribution in the present volume, non-conventionalized speech acts can be studied due to added annotation. The methodology Garcia used was careful line-by-line reading, assigning to ‘each utterance that was identiﬁed as a speech act . . a code as to what type of speech act it represented’. These annotated subsets were then processed further by use of corpus tools assigning further linguistic and contextual information to each utterance. That is, the analysis started off by means of horizontal reading (identifying speech acts) while the provision of further corpus tools to the subsets added a vertical dimension to the analysis: speech acts could be categorized not only in terms of their type but also in terms of their associated contextual factors.