By Patrick R. Bennett
Because the name exhibits, this detailed source is a guide on comparative linguistics, with the examples taken completely from Semitic languages. it really is an leading edge quantity that remembers the sooner culture of textbooks of comparative philology, which, even though, completely handled Indo-European languages. it's suited to scholars with no less than a 12 months of a Semitic language.
by way of some distance the most important part of the ebook are the 9 wordlists that offer the information to be manipulated by way of the coed. Says reviewer Peter Daniels, the wordlists "constitute a different source for all of comparative linguistics--a massive volume of uniform information from a number of comparable languages. they might be precious for any classification in comparative linguistics, not only for these particularly in Semitic."
Scattered during the textual content are 25 routines in response to the wordlists that supply a very good creation to the tools of comparativists. additionally incorporated are paradigms of the phonological platforms of ten Semitic languages in addition to Coptic and a sort of Berber. A bibliography that courses the scholar into additional analyzing in Semitic linguistics completes the quantity.
Read Online or Download Comparative Semitic Linguistics: A Manual PDF
Similar semantics books
Quantity 34 of "Syntax and Semantics" is an intensive and available assessment and creation to Lexical practical Grammar (LFG), a concept of the content material and illustration of alternative elements of linguistic constitution and the kinfolk that carry among them. The e-book motivates and describes the 2 syntactic constructions of LFG: floor phrasal association is represented by way of a context-free word constitution tree, and extra summary sensible syntactic kin like topic and item are represented individually, at practical constitution.
Context and the Attitudes collects 13 seminal essays by way of Mark Richard on semantics and propositional attitudes. those essays advance a nuanced account of the semantics and pragmatics of our speak about such attitudes, an account on which in asserting what somebody thinks, we provide our phrases as a 'translation' or illustration of ways the objective of our speak represents the realm.
This booklet brings jointly novel paintings at the semantics and pragmatics of convinced indefinite expressions that still express modality. those epistemic indefinites are determiners or pronouns that sign lack of know-how at the a part of the speaker, reminiscent of German irgendein and Spanish algun: the sentence Maria se caso con algun medico ('Maria married a few healthcare professional or other') either makes an existential assertion that there's a surgeon that Maria married and indications the speaker's lack of ability or unwillingness to spot the surgeon in query.
- Semantics and the Body: Meaning from Frege to the Postmodern (Toronto Studies in Semiotics and Communication)
- Semantics: A Coursebook
- Continuations and Natural Language (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics)
- Discourse Contextualism: A Framework for Contextualist Semantics and Pragmatics
- For More than One Voice: Toward a Philosophy of Vocal Expression
Extra resources for Comparative Semitic Linguistics: A Manual
Simple and easy to grasp, the model is useful in formulating other hypotheses about linguistic prehistory. Unfortunately, this is not the way language relationships really work. In reality, linguistic differentiation begins before there is a real separation of communities, and linguistic contact, with mutual in˘uence, persists long after two languages are differentiated. Lexicostatistics necessarily re˘ects this reality. The vocabulary that we ˜nd shared by two languages derives in part from common inheritance, in part from borrowing between the two languages (in either direction), in part from borrowing (by both) from other languages, and we have no easy way to differentiate sources.
When we look for a conditioning factor for this set of correspondences, we ˜nd none. There is nothing in the shapes of the Syriac words containing t to support a split in Arabic. We therefore postulate two source consonants, to which we assign the symbols *Q5 and *t respectively. We assign *t to the set in Table 8 because the languages compared show identical re˘exes. While we could use any symbol not already in use for the correspondence t : z, we pick *Q5 to re˘ect the voicelessness of Syriac t and the fricative nature of Arabic z (an emphatic dental fricative for many speakers).
But if no two agree, we will not take the results seriously. The Linguistic List Vocabulary lists supply the raw material for most of the techniques we will use. It is, of course, possible to compare anything. One can (and does) compare phonological systems, or in˘ectional markers; one can (and does) compare syntactic patterns. But vocabulary is most often the focus because of the large number of items available and the manageable size of the items. The total number of units in any phonological system is small; in the Semitic languages, the total for a speci˜c language may be as low as 20 or as high as 35.