By Ofra Magidor
Type error are sentences resembling 'Green rules sleep furiously' or 'Saturday is in bed'. They strike us as hugely infelicitous however it is difficult to give an explanation for accurately why this can be so. Ofra Magidor explores 4 methods to type blunders in philosophy of language and linguistics, and develops and defends an unique, presuppositional account.
Read or Download Category mistakes PDF
Similar semantics books
Quantity 34 of "Syntax and Semantics" is an intensive and available assessment and advent to Lexical practical Grammar (LFG), a concept of the content material and illustration of other facets of linguistic constitution and the family members that carry among them. The publication motivates and describes the 2 syntactic buildings of LFG: floor phrasal association is represented through a context-free word constitution tree, and extra summary useful syntactic kin like topic and item are represented individually, at practical constitution.
Context and the Attitudes collects 13 seminal essays by way of Mark Richard on semantics and propositional attitudes. those essays advance a nuanced account of the semantics and pragmatics of our speak about such attitudes, an account on which in announcing what an individual thinks, we provide our phrases as a 'translation' or illustration of how the objective of our speak represents the area.
This e-book brings jointly novel paintings at the semantics and pragmatics of convinced indefinite expressions that still show modality. those epistemic indefinites are determiners or pronouns that sign lack of knowledge at the a part of the speaker, akin to German irgendein and Spanish algun: the sentence Maria se caso con algun medico ('Maria married a few health practitioner or other') either makes an existential assertion that there's a general practitioner that Maria married and signs the speaker's lack of ability or unwillingness to spot the health care provider in query.
- Transformational Syntax and Model Theoretic Semantics: A Case Study in Modern Irish (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy)
- The Study of Language
- Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning: Volume 1
- The Routledge Handbook of Language and Identity (Routledge Handbooks in Applied Linguistics)
- The Meaning of Topic and Focus: The 59th Street Bridge Accent (Routledge Studies in Germanic Linguistics)
- Towards A Definition of Topos: Approaches to Analogical Reasoning
Extra info for Category mistakes
So, for example, ‘The dog frightens the cat’ and ‘The dog frightens the elephant’ come out as syntactically permissible, but not ‘The dog frightens sincerity’. 1 of the Aspects), Chomsky reopens the question of whether category mistakes should be treated as semantic or syntactic. His discussion is somewhat tentative, but Chomsky suggests at least one compelling argument in favour of the syntactic approach. The core of the argument is this. Chomsky acknowledges that category mistakes are at best a borderline case of syntactically ill-formed sentences, but he argues that the syntactic machinery that he uses in order to address the phenomena (namely, selectional features) is independently motivated.
51 For a classic exchange between interpretative semanticists and generative semanticists, one in which category mistakes play a central role, see Katz (1970) and the response of McCawley (1971). For an excellent extensive history of the debate between these two camps see Harris (1993). 52 This position is sometimes explicitly endorsed. See for example McCawley’s claim that what makes ‘Robert own’s John’s after image’ odd is that “an afterimage is something that it makes no sense to speak of someone’s owning”.
But the crucial point is that the claims on which I rely are, by and large, widely accepted, and in particular should seem equally plausible (at least prima facie) to proponents of the meaninglessness view. Of course, if my arguments are successful, proponents of the view might ultimately choose to reject some of these assumptions rather than 7 Note that in addition to the view that category mistakes are in fact meaningless (in English, or other familiar natural languages), there is a slightly weaker version of the meaninglessness view, one which maintains that there are possible languages in which category mistakes are meaningless (see McDaniel (MS) for an endorsement of this weaker claim).